Moegirlpedia:Anti-vandalism policy

This page, "Moegirlpedia:Anti-vandalism policy", is an active policy of English Moegirlpedia. The text of the policies has been deliberated and adopted by the community. All users have the responsibility to follow the policies outlined in this text. If you see a need to amend or change the policy, please start a discussion thread on the discussion board. If the policy does need to be amended/changed, please start a corresponding proposal.

Translation in progress This page is currently being translated; it may be incomplete, inaccurate or obfuscating. Moegirlpedia hopes that you can help with translating, proofreading, or copy editing this page. Progress: 50% This template was placed on 01:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC). The last edit was on 01:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC).

This policy specifies common vandalism behavior and its countermeasures on Moegirlpedia. Maintenance personnel shall comply with this policy to deal with all types of vandalism. In the event of a situation not covered by this policy, we will act in accordance with the spirit of this policy.

Vandalism is the act of intentionally jeopardizing the security and order of Moegirlpedia by editing the page content or adding malicious code several times.

Deducing whether something is vandalism should be done with caution. Please maintain a good-faith presumption and do not harm beginner users. A large number of edits that contain controversies are not necessarily vandalism, but can also be bad with good intentions.

Main criteria for vandalism

By amount

General vandalism

Refers to acts of vandalism that are small in number and small in scope and impact. The general recommendation is to limit the number of sessions to three. Can be considered as "minimal but constitutes damage".

Mass vandalism

Refers to a high number or wide range of acts of vandalism. It is generally recommended to limit the number of sessions to 5 and above. Can be considered as "numerous and extensive".

Severe vandalism

Refers to an act of vandalism that is one of the following:

1. Performing the first, second, or fourth type of vandalism described in Category III, Article 1 of "Specific acts of vandalism" below;
2. Performing the acts described in categories III, V, and VI below with a high frequency or wide scope;
3. New users (meaning those who have registered for less than 7 days or are not in the autoconfirmed user group, here, the state before the start of the first act of vandalism is taken into account, the same below) performing the acts described in Article 5 to 6 of Category III below.

• It should be noted that:
  • Mass vandalism, which is an evaluation of vandalism based on the amount and extent of damage.
  • Serious vandalism, is the evaluation of vandalism based on the impact and consequences caused by the vandalism.
  • Both mass vandalism and severe vandalism are mutually exclusive with the evaluation of general vandalism. And for the same act of vandalism the evaluations of massive and severe vandalism can coexist.

By motivation

Intentional vandalism

The user repeatedly performs the same vandalism or refuses to communicate or clearly performs malicious vandalism. It is generally recommended that users who deliberately vandalize are dealt with heavily.

Accidental vandalism

The user has no subjective intention to vandalize but substantially constitutes vandalism.

Unknowing vandalism

Users vandalize because they do not understand the relevant guidelines and policies. As a rule, ignorant vandalism should be preceded by a reminder.

Maintenance personnel have the right to make their own adjudication judgments on a case-by-case basis. However, in principle, it should not be stricter than the above criteria.

Specific acts of vandalism

Vandal behavior includes the following types:

I: Threat to the site's operation

1. Adding or uploading information that involves politically sensitive, censorship-related, Explicit pornography and other content that should be removed immediately;
2. Creating pages that should be subject to speedy deletion
3. Not being a Moegirlpedia staff member and not having obtained written authorization from the staff but impersonating in the name of Moegirlpedia and its staff.
4. Use of possible system vulnerabilities to tamper with important pages such as the policy, the guidelines, or site-wide JS/CSS;
5. Intentionally displaying inappropriate content by bypassing abuse filters, anti-vandalism extensions such as blacklisting, one-party pass (blocking system), etc. (Contains operations performed under the guise of so-called "testing" without the permission of the administrator or STAFF).

II: Harassing others

1. Engaging in attacking personally, or to a group of people, or using slander or verbal abuse,
2. Adding content that relates to the reality of the privacy of other users or the undisclosed privacy of the person described in the article;
3. Harassing users through discussion pages, comment sections, emails or other ways.

III: Vandalizing page content

1. Adding commercial promotion content that exceeds the limits of what is reasonably necessary, such as introductions, corroboration, and citations;
2. Intentionally replacing normal content with large amounts of duplicate or expanded content, gaps, or incorrect content
3. Performing editorial actions that significantly affect the normal display of the page and are assessed by the administrator to constitute vandalism;
4. Adding misinformation, rumors, disproven theories or references;
5. Adding a large amount of content that is not relevant to what the page title refers to;

Anti-vandalism measures

Warnings

Out of the principle of presumption of good faith, maintenance personnel should first warn users who commit acts of vandalism.

It is recommended that the warning discussion thread be titled with a warning so that other maintenance personnel can check it against the "Suspected Maintenance Personnel Leaving Warning" label.

It is recommended that maintenance personnel recuse themselves from issues that concern them, and avoid actions such as sending warnings or taking other measures to the other party they are arguing with.

If the maintenance staff believes that the user in question has committed the act in question due to being new/a mistake, etc. and has the will to correct it, it can also be used as only a reminder.

For users who perform Type I and Type II vandalism, warnings may not be needed: issue a direct ban and other measures.

Banning

Banning users is only one of the means to solve the problem or temporarily slow down the intensity of the conflict, not the end goal, and should not be abused. The improper use of blocking can cause users to retaliate against Moegirlpedia in return, generating massive content vandalism or reputational damage.

Due to the IP allocation policy of network operators in mainland China, enabling the automatic IP blocking option has a certain risk of preventing a large number of users from editing due to chain blocking, so unless the vandalism is severe and implemented by an administrator, the option [Automatically block the last IP address used by this user, and any subsequent IP addresses they try to edit from] should not be used when blocking.